Why is respecting the empire important?

If you and most everyone around you is currently subject to the influence of any empire, then it may be relevant to consider what influences the empire might have in your life and the lives of those around you. Not only do empires program people to focus on certain issues, to interpret those issues in certain ways, and to respond to their programmed interpretations through certain behaviors. Further, empires also issue rewards and punishments. So, most simply, this presentation is to invite people who would value better attracting governments rewards and better avoiding government penalties to contact me for additional interaction and partnership.

Empires may reward behaviors that are beneficial to the empire (such as the payment of any tax debts that the empire invents). Empires may also punish behaviors that it is beneficial to the empire to punish.

For instance, consider the long history among human governments of public rituals of human sacrifice (capital punishment). If simply killing the targets is the issue, then sufficient methods would include private executions or assassinations (which may conducted in secret) as well as mass slaughter of civilians and soldiers. Why is it that governments so often also publicize their executions or even allow a public audience to attend in person?

Are empires flaunting their social dominance? Are empires flaunting their exclusive privileges?

Note that empires assert an EXCLUSIVE right to kill (within a certain geographical region). Generally speaking, individuals are subject to being penalized (by the empire) for intentionally kidnapping and killing a human. However, when a government ritual authorizes the arresting and incarcerating of a candidate for criminal penalties, and then the killing of that individual, that intentional killing is not only allowed but may be encouraged and even widely publicized.

While those contrasts are quite simple, government rituals for prosecuting, convicting, and executing people can be complex. In the case of several of the individuals that were accused of and indicted for participating in the assassination of US President Abraham Lincoln, they were officially pardoned and the criminal charges against them were canceled. Some had already been sentenced and served their entire punishment. Others were still subject to criminal trials at the time of their pardoning.

Some analysts claimed that the pardoning of those people accused of criminal activity was a politically-motivated act. Aren't most political acts politically motivated?

Was the individual who issued the pardons interested in issuing the pardons in order to maintain secrecy in regard to the details of the assassination of Lincoln? Why is it that the most common day for a US President to issue pardons is the very last day of that President's time in office? Are they issuing pardons on the very last day of their Presidential term in order to avoid any lasting public scrutiny in to the logic behind their pardons?

We can observe that mainstream media coverage of presidential pardons tends to be very minimal. Is it possible that the mainstream media could be part of a larger network to influence what issues get the most publicity? Could the media be a tool for focusing the public on certain issues while distracting the public from other issues? As for the specific ideological controversies that are publicized by major media networks, is there an extremely wide range of viewpoints publicized, or usually just 2 or 3 basic points of view?

It can be important to respect an empire because of the power of an empire relative to the average civilian within a territory occupied or ruled by the local branch of an empire. Empires concentrate wealth, military technologies, and the technical skills to operate that military technology and to develop even more advanced weapons of mass destruction.

Empires also program the masses to focus on certain issues in particular (and in certain programmed ways), to ignore all other risks and opportunities, and finally to perceive certain things as risky (such as cholesterol) and certain things as safe or beneficial (such as the use of statin medications to disrupt the liver's ability to manufacture cholesterol).

Could empires intentionally mislead people to perceive certain risky things as safe (if that benefits the empire)? Could empires intentionally mislead people to perceive certain things as risky or dangerous which would actually be beneficial to those people (but in a way that goes against the interests in the empire concentrating dominance over those people)?

Why is respecting the empire important? First, I respect what empires are: powerful, dangerous, well-organized, always secretive, and frequently deceptive. In other words, they deserve caution. Second, I respect that empires can offer exclusive favoritism and privilege (as well as withdraw favors and privileges).

My interest in respecting the empire is to minimize risks and maximize rewards. Those who similarly respect the dangers and opportunities presented by empires are invited to contact me now.

Next: What is the empire?

CLICK HERE TO SEND A MESSAGE.